Search for: "Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. et al v. Doe" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2013-09-14: NSA cracked most online encryption says report http:/… http://t.co/itp9XUZejM -> Motion to add copyright owner dismissed in Spanski Enterprises, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm by Mark Litwak
§ 101 et seq. as well as common law breach of contract claims against Defendants Steven Spielberg; DW Studios, LLC; Paramount Pictures Corporation; Viacom, Inc.; NBC Universal, Inc.; Universal Pictures Company, Inc.; Universal City Studios, LLP; United International Pictures, B.V.; and Does 1-10,[1] alleging that the motion picture Disturbia — a film produced by Spielberg, owner of DW Studios, LLC, which is… [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:16 pm
Zimmerman (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (Copyrights & Campaigns) District Court C D California: IsoHunt told to pull .torrent files offline, likely to close: Columbia Pictures Industries Inc., et al. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:40 pm
Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., 663 F.Supp. 706 (S.D.N.Y. 1987). [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am by Schachtman
Jonathan Samet, et al., Institute of Medicine, Asbestos: Selected Health Effects (2006). [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
  Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP ADR Blog)Global - CopyrightMotion Picture Association’s Operation Blackout, targeting illegal recording of movies – A step ahead. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
The process involved engaging factories in different countries to imitate and merge aspects of these designer bags, resulting in a unique product.[15] “We deliberately gave vague, incomplete, and ‘bad’ instructions to these factories to leave as much of the decision-making as possible out of our hands,” MSCHF stated.[16] With the Global Supply Chain Telephone handbag, MSCHF aims not to mock the fashion industry but to bring attention to the often overlooked labor… [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 9:18 am
            Having determined that the due process requirement was no longer viable in light of the Supreme Court's decision in N.L.R.B. v. [read post]